Comparison Estimates Of Prevalence Factors -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Comparison Estimates Of Prevalence Factors? Answer: Introduction The case study shows an insight regarding the research methodology followed by a student who is enrolled in MSc in Management. The case study shows that his interest of a particular idea led him to choose his topic in research. It is important to consult with the teacher or professor before deciding on the topic. The first step that was asked to do by the tutor is a literature review on the topic of research. The researcher wanted to carry out a systematic review as he felt that it is a step by step process which will help him to understand the literature better. The researcher had shared a plan of conducting the review was submitted and the tutor felt that he had the technical understanding of the procedure, but when he had eventually sent a draft the tutor commented it on being too descriptive and missing out on critical analysis of the literature. I is essential to have a clear focus and well-formulated review questions to ensure that the process proceeds as planned, as writing a research paper is a lengthy procedure the question will help the researcher to align the findings with the question and no deviate from the actual topic of research. 1b. when the focus is too broad it is difficult to keep track of the information as while researching several other related ideas will be included which will again take away the concentration from the topic. On the other hand if the topic is too narrow it is a possibility that you may not find enough information regarding the topic in terms of facts and figures and arguments to back up the statements that the researcher is going to conclude in the paper (Paiva et al., 2014). It is important to revise the review question as the question has a lot of layers,marketing question should be simple and straight forward so that it is easy to answer and easy to comprehend by the readers. Moreover, the tutor pointed out that the draft was not critical in nature it just had facts, figures and statements which should not be in the case of a research paper; a research paper has to more of the researchers view aligned with the views of the other authors who have previously worked in the field. It is important to adopt a systematic approach as that would ensure that no information or data regarding the research is missed, if any important information is left out it might impact on the findings and conclusion of the research. It helps in understanding the topic of research insightfully with and helps in building a fundamental knowledge. One of the disadvantages of the process is that sometimes information that is already published may be irrelevant at the time of the review the researcher has to be cautious at every point to make sure that the procedure is relevant (Paiva et al., 2014). Being critical in the approach helps the researcher build their own point of view, with the help of arguments they can state facts and develop own findings. Alternate approaches, ideas, insights are developed by critically analyzing literature. If some of the facts or assumptions are incorrect then the effort that has been put is wasted as that will not be accepted, hence the researcher has to be careful in placing any arguments with sufficient proof and reference. c. Emmanuel did not first understand the meaning of being critical, he thought being critical in the approach would mean disrespect towards the authors whose work was being reviewed, he gathered that being critical is more than just recognizing the gaps in the literature it is also about incorporating own ideas and adding to the initial concepts that is available. Hence to balance the two approaches he made two sections one which had his original findings and the other was an argumentative discussion. This has helped him to be systematic as well as develop a critical approach (Fowkes et al., 2013). Deepwater Horizon Accident is a popular oil spill accident that occurred, the information and data that is available regarding the accident is large hence he should be careful regarding the information that he will chose to use in his research, he should take information that is relevant to the research questions. The findings of the literature review will help understand the process better which will further guide him to form his own opinion. The literature will also help him from a base from which he can begin his data collection process. Reference list: Fowkes, F. G. R., Rudan, D., Rudan, I., Aboyans, V., Denenberg, J. O., McDermott, M. M., ... Criqui, M. H. (2013). Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. management,382(9901), 1329-1340. Paiva, C. E., Barroso, E. M., Carneseca, E. C., de Pdua Souza, C., dos Santos, F. T., Lpez, R. V. M., Paiva, S. B. R. (2014). A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: a systematic review.BMC medical research methodology,14(1), 8.